Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/12/1907
Commonwealth v. Bartholomew
Citations
- 35 Pa. Super. 114
- 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 219
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Motion in arrest of judgment — Insufficiency of evidence.</p> <p>A motion in arrest of judgment in a criminal case is not the proper method of raising the question of the insufficiency of the evidence.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. HanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-11-19· cited 19×
- Krause v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1880-03-04· cited 18×
- Pauli v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-03-24· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. GurleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1863-05-25· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SchollenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-05-23· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. RuddleNorthampton County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1891-05-04· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-04-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.