Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2/15/2001
Commonwealth v. Barry
Citations
- 51 Mass. App. Ct. 9
- 742 N.E.2d 584
- 2001 Mass. App. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding error because “the defendant heard only a recitation of the names or titles of [the charged] crimes, and was taken to have ‘stipulated’ to unstated facts supposed to ‘base’ the complaints”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-02-06· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. CorreaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-10-22· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. MahadeoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-04-15· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. RzepphiewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-14· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-05-11· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-11-13· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.