Commonwealth v. Barnyak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements made by a “panic stricken” shooting victim at the hospital in response to police questioning were admissible under the “excited utterance” hearsay exception
• holding that excited utterances by shooting victim and son were admissible even though made more than a half an hour after the shooting and in response to police questioning, where both victim and son were still visibly experiencing the overpowering emotion of the event
• holding that excited utterances by shooting victim and son were admissible even though made more than a half an hour after the shooting and in response to police questioning, where both victim and son were still visibly experiencing the overpowering emotion of the event
• noting that there is no crime of attempted third-degree murder
• noting that there is no crime of attempted third-degree murder
• noting that there is no crime of attempted third-degree murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).