Commonwealth v. Barlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Code’s requirements go to the trustworthiness of the evidence. If that issue is raised, failure to comply does not permit the results to be admitted as substantive evidence with lessened reliability[;] it precludes admission.”
• tests not administered in compliance with Section 77.24 go to the trustworthiness of the evidence, and “failure to comply does not permit the results to be admitted as substantive evidence with lessened reliability[;] it precludes admission”
• “The [Vehicle] Code’s requirements go to the trustworthiness of the evidence. If that issue is raised, failure to comply does not permit the results to be admitted as substantive evidence with lessened reliability[:] it precludes admission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Snell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-13· cited 27×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-15· cited 222×
• Commonwealth v. Stoops
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-10· cited 12×