Commonwealth v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that a claim that the sentencing court relied on impermissible factors in sentencing raises a substantial question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Berry, J., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-09-26
• Com. v. Davis, A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-07-22

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Commonwealth v. Cartrette
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
• Commonwealth v. Colon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-24· cited 398×
• Commonwealth v. Allen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-12· cited 339×
• Commonwealth v. Derry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-11-15· cited 274×
• Zane v. Friends Hospital
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-19· cited 203×
• Commonwealth v. Lambert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-18· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Bromley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-29· cited 95×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-29· cited 93×
• Commonwealth v. Sims
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-05· cited 70×
• Commonwealth v. McNeal
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-16· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Kraft
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-13· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Melius
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-09-19· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Ahearn
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-18· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 8×