Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ballance

Citations

  • 203 A.3d 1027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that legality of sentence is always subject to review within the PCRA providing the court has jurisdiction, which is tied to the filing of a timely petition
  • stating that “no court has jurisdiction to hear an untimely PCRA petition” (citation omitted and emphasis omitted)
  • stating that “no court has jurisdiction to hear an untimely PCRA petition” (citation and emphasis omitted)
  • stating that “no court has jurisdiction to hear an untimely PCRA petition” (citation and emphasis omitted)
  • noting that a timely post-sentence motion will -8- J-S18041-24 toll the thirty-day appeal period until the disposition of the motion
  • stating that “no court has jurisdiction to hear an untimely PCRA petition” (citation omitted and emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, McLaughlin, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.