Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/20/2001
Commonwealth v. Baker
Citations
- 766 A.2d 328
- 564 Pa. 192
- 2001 Pa. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that “[t]he contemnor must have had notice of the specific order or decree.”
- charge of indirect criminal contempt consists of claim that violation of court order or decree occurred outside presence of court
- the court’s stating that Appellant’s “[s]creaming that [Love’s] a whore and accusing her [of] sleeping with other men, clearly demonstrates his wrongful intent”
- charge of indirect criminal contempt consists of claim that violation of court order or decree occurred outside presence of court
- trial court finding of contempt will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion
- trial court finding of contempt will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-17· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-18· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-09-27· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-09-27· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. AshtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-13· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-19· cited 46×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Moody, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. GriffithsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-06· cited 24×
- In the Interest of: E.O., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-09-05· cited 14×
- Hutchinson, B. v. Verstraeten, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-11-08· cited 9×
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-09-16· cited 8×
- Yoskowitz v. YazdanfarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-05-24· cited 5×
- In the Interest of: J.J.M., Appeal of: J.J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-10· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-06· cited 2×
- American Red Cross v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ROMANO)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-15· cited 1×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ivery, B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Archie, B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27
- In the Interest of: E.O., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-30
- Bickelman v. Abington Memorial HospitalPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-09-11
- Krosnowski v. WardPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-05-02
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,242×
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 336×
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-01-07· cited 114×
- Crozer-Chester Medical Center v. MoranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-09· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-20· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-23· cited 42×
- Diamond v. DiamondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-05· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-31· cited 40×
- In Re Deed of Trust of Rose Hill Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-23· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.