Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baker

Citations

  • 201 N.E.2d 829
  • 348 Mass. 60
  • 1964 Mass. LEXIS 670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling by judge that witness was excused afforded the witness broader protection than he was entitled to, where witness claimed privilege immediately after answering questions with respect to his name and address; the privilege is “merely an option of refusal, not a prohibition of inquiry”
  • “[t]he privilege does not preclude interrogation . . . [I]t can not be assumed that every question that would be asked would tend to incriminate. The danger of incrimination must be real and not imaginary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Spalding, Whittehokb, Cutter, Kibk, Spiegel, Eeaedon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.