Commonwealth v. Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a trial court’s failure to adhere to the law constitutes an abuse of discretion
• observing that a trial court's failure to adhere to the law constitutes an abuse of discretion
• holding “Superior Court did not err in applying general rule, consistent with federal speedy-trial jurisprudence, attributing notice to counsel to the defendant for Rule 600 purposes
• explaining that “Rule 8 Burno contends that the Commonwealth acted without due diligence in pursuing the interlocutory appeal to the Superior Court because the Commonwealth lacked jurisdiction to appeal pursuant to Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure 311(d
• “[Wjhere a period of delay is caused by the defendant’s willful failure to appear at a court proceeding of which he has notice, exclusion is warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).