Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baez

Citations

  • 431 A.2d 909
  • 494 Pa. 388
  • 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a witness cannot be confronted with the out-of-court statements of other witnesses on cross-examination
  • use of prior inconsistent statements of a non-party witness in court and subject to cross-examination allowed for impeachment purposes
  • trial court erred in permitting prosecution to impeach defendant with another witness's hearsay statement to police which contradicted defendant's testimony
  • trial court erred in permitting prosecution to impeach defendant with another witness's hearsay statement to police which contradicted defendant's testimony
  • “[t]he credibility of a witness may be impeached ... by showing that on a prior occasion he made a statement, either oral or written, that is inconsistent with his present testimony....”
  • detective’s written account of what a third-party witness had told him is the type of unreliable out-of-court declaration the hearsay rule was designed to exclude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Kauffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.