Commonwealth v. Andrulewicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence sufficient for indecent exposure where Andrulewicz exposed himself and engaged in manual masturbation in front of sixteen- and ten-year- old girls
• finding that factfinder “was free to accept [the victim’s] characterization of what transpired with Appellant, particularly her representation that [the defendant] “raped” her
• upholding indecent assault conviction based on record testimony of victim who claimed sexual intercourse with defendant was without consent
• applying sufficiency of evidence standard to claim challenging denial of motion for judgment of acquittal
• applying sufficiency of evidence standard to claim challenging denial of motion for judgment of acquittal
• stating “it is for the fact finder to make credibility determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).