Commonwealth v. Ammerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “courts in this circuit have required trade dress plaintiffs, at the very 6 least, to provide adequate notice by including in their complaint ‘a complete recitation of the 7 concrete elements of [their] alleged trade dress’”
• observing that “courts in this 15 circuit have required trade dress plaintiffs, at the very least, to provide adequate notice by 16 including in their complaint ‘a complete recitation of the concrete elements of [their] alleged 17 trade dress’”
• granting motion 8 to dismiss trade dress claim because “courts in this circuit have required trade dress plaintiffs, at 9 the very least, to provide adequate notice by including in their complaint ‘a complete recitation of 10 the concrete elements of [their] alleged trade dress’”
• “[T]he analysis is the same for a 1 trademark dilution claim whether under federal or California law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).