Commonwealth v. Amazeen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not err in excusing a juror previously sentenced to six months in jail
• unnecessary to repeat manslaughter instruction when jury inquired what constituted murder in first and second degrees
• judge found indifferent a prospective juror who knew prosecutor, was a member of the same church parish, went to the same high school, and stated that connections would not affect his impartiality
• “To the extent that conflicting inferences are possible from the evidence, ‘it is for the jury to determine where the truth lies’ ”
• “To the extent that conflicting inferences are possible from the evidence, ‘it is for the jury to determine where the truth lies’ ”
• “To the extent that conflicting inferences are possible from the evidence, ‘it is for the jury to determine where the truth lies’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).