Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/23/2009
Commonwealth v. Allen
Citations
- 73 Mass. App. Ct. 862
- 903 N.E.2d 231
- 2009 Mass. App. LEXIS 381
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- individual who had completed criminal sentence, yet remained in custody solely due to clerical error, not \prisoner\ subject to commitment
- “The fact that a person is in State custody is not enough to make him a ‘prisoner’ within the meaning of [G. L. c. 123A,] § 12([6])”
- defendant in State custody as result of clerical error was not “prisoner” within meaning of G. L. c. 123A, § 12 [b], and Commonwealth could not seek his commitment as SDP
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolohojian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McIntireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-11-05· cited 17×
- Coffin v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Treatment CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-11-04· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. Brian LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-07-01· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. SzargowiczMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-08-27· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. BallardMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-02-02· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. GardnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-09-14· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. DeWeldonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-10-12· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. ShaheedMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-04-14
- Stevens v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Superior Court· 2011-04-01
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.