Commonwealth v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• odor of alcohol on defendant’s breath accompanied by PBT results of .04 was sufficient to sustain conviction of underage drinking
• the results of a PBT create a rebuttable presumption that defendant consumed alcoholic beverages for purposes of offense of underage drinking
• evidence that PBT given to defendant resulted in a .04 reading accompanied by testimony that defendant’s breath smelled of alcohol was sufficient to sustain conviction for underage drinking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Marshall
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-12· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Breslin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-21· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Brigidi
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-06· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Myrtetus
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-22· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Stanley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-17· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Williamson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-23· cited 12×