Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/20/1980

Commonwealth v. Allen

Citations

420 A.2d 653
278 Pa. Super. 501
1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

deeming “done that which ought to have been done,” and reaching the merits of an appeal where trial court’s order had not been entered on the docket
in which this court reached the merits of the appeal even though the lower court’s order had never been entered upon the docket
court recognized that case could be remanded for parties to perfect the record or quashed without prejudice to the filing of a subsequent appeal once the trial court order had been reduced to judgment
where the trial court order from which the defendant appealed had not been entered on the trial court’s docket, declining to quash the appeal “[i]n the interest of judicial economy, [and] we shall exercise our power under Pa.R.A.P. 105(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Hoffman, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.