Commonwealth v. Aiello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “knowledge of the presence of drugs or of weapons more readily warrants an inference of control against a driver than a passenger”
• “[K]nowledge of the presence of drugs or of weapons more readily warrants an inference of control against a driver than a passenger”
• possession “may often be inferred from proximity conjoined with knowledge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-02· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-08-16· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Romero
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-11-14· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Perez
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2004-03-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-04-03· cited 111×
• Commonwealth v. Deagle
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-09-29· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Daley
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-11-12· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Sadberry
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-04-06· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Sanchez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-05-08· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Gray
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-05-10· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Manzanillo
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-07-14· cited 4×