Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ahart

Citations

  • 464 Mass. 437
  • 983 N.E.2d 1203
  • 2013 WL 718664
  • 2013 Mass. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cell phone records \corroborated much of [witness's] testimony\ concerning his whereabouts at time of crime
  • the officer's description of how he verified the witness's grand jury testimony was not improper vouching because \he had not expressed his personal belief in the [witness's] credibility\
  • “the absence of any objection or request for a curative instruction by experienced defense counsel is some indication that the comment by the prosecutor could not have created a substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice”
  • not improper vouching to argue that \officer should be believed because he was a twenty-six-year veteran of the State police[ ] ... and ... had worked on more than one hundred homicide investigations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.