Skip to main content
· 3/16/1916

Commonwealth v. Agato

Citations

  • 63 Pa. Super. 274
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 150

Syllabus

<p>Criminal law — Larceny—Identification of article stolen — Two dollar note — Evidence.</p> <p>A conviction of larceny of a two-dollar note will be sustained without actual identification of the note, where the evidence shows that the prosecutor’s pocket was picked of a two dollar note which he had placed in his pocket while the prisoner and two companions were standing close to him; that all three men attempted to escape when a policeman was called; that the prisoner was arrested, and there was found on him á crumpled two dollar note.</p>

Judges: Bice, Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.