Commonwealth v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘It is not necessary for conviction that there be evidence of the actual operation of a lottery. * * * It is sufficient if the defendant be found in possession of the paraphernalia necessary for operation’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Kravitz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-04-18· cited 174×
• Commonwealth v. EVANS
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-08-10· cited 96×
• Commonwealth v. Aljoe
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-01-04· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Hornberger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-13· cited 17×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-17· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. DuHadway
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-16· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Cese
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-11-15· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Lane
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Tunstall
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. GRAHAM
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-06-15· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Kumitis
  Bucks County Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1958-11-07· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Freeman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-18
• Commonwealth v. Neal
  Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1964-05-28
• Commonwealth v. Sestina
  Warren County Court of Common Pleas· 1987-10-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Winter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-07-14· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Rich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-11· cited 10×