Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Adams

Citations

  • 177 A.3d 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \whether a dismissal is warranted turns on whether the Commonwealth intended to deprive the defendant of a fair trial\
  • holding that “whether a dismissal is warranted turns on whether the Commonwealth intended to deprive the defendant of a fair trial”
  • distinguishing between prosecutorial error that could be corrected in a future trial versus intentional subversion of the court process, which bars retrial
  • affirming trial court's conclusion that dismissal would be overly harsh where trial court found no evidence of police or prosecution attempting to sabotage Appellant's case
  • distinguishing between prosecutorial error that could be corrected in a future trial versus intentional subversion of the court process, which bars retrial
  • explaining our deferential review of credibility determinations in the context of a double jeopardy ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson, Ransom, Solano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.