Skip to main content
· 9/28/1988

Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Fassano Bar Corp.

Citations

  • 120 Pa. Commw. 125
  • 547 A.2d 1299
  • 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is not the court’s concern that an employer may . . . be too hard on its employee”
  • finding that two-day period between request for accommodation and termination did not save claims from summary judgment in light of intervening report of PTO policy violations by plaintiff, which supported proffered reason for termination
  • “We have held that even a former supervisor’s inconsistent statement cannot create an inference of pretext where there is nothing in the record to suggest that the supervisor participated in the decision to terminate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.