Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James T. Lynn, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mentioning no statutory deadline which might contradict the suspension in question, and recognizing instead evidence of congressional acceptance of the moratorium's legality
• mentioning no statutory deadline which might contradict the suspension in question, and recog- nizing instead evidence of congressional acceptance of the moratorium's legality
• “[D]iscerning Congress’s intent to bestow or withhold discretion . . . is not a simple matter of tallying the ‘shalls’ and ‘mays’ and finding that the ‘mays’ have it.”
• agency decision reversed because concentrated solely on land use considerations
• agency decision reversed because concentrated solely on land use considerations
• upholding the executive’s decision not to spend appropriated funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).