Commonwealth General Corp. v. York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding court of appeals erred in finding specific jurisdiction because, even though shareholder had contacts with Texas, the claims against shareholder did not have a sufficient connection with these contacts
• “Stock ownership and the related right of control that stock ownership gives to stockholders are insufficient to destroy the distinctness of corporate entities for jurisdictional purposes.”
• \Stock ownership and the related right of control that stock ownership gives to stockholders are insufficient to destroy the distinctness of corporate entities for jurisdictional purposes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Commonwealth General Corp. v. York

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Commonwealth General Corp. v. York
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-08-05· cited 7×