Commonwealth Ex Rel. Loring v. Loring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasonable living expenses must be allowed unless excessive or assumed to avoid child support
• reasonable living expenses must be allowed unless excessive or assumed to avoid child support
• trial court’s disregard for parent’s reasonable living expenses constitutes an abuse of discretion
• trial court's disregard for parent's reasonable living expenses constitutes an abuse of discretion
• support obligations are well-nigh absolute
• support obligations are well-nigh absolute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ritter v. Ritter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-05· cited 57×
• Funk v. Funk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-06· cited 28×
• King v. King
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-26· cited 14×
• Fichthorn v. Fichthorn
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-30· cited 11×
• Babish v. Babish
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-25· cited 10×
• Steenland-Parker v. Parker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-18· cited 10×
• Haley v. Haley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-11-01· cited 10×
• Bradley v. Bradley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-25· cited 9×
• Michael v. Michael
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-27· cited 9×
• Bower v. Hoover
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-20· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melzer v. Witsberger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-07-13· cited 193×
• Weiser v. Weiser
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 54×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Scanlon v. Scanlon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-18· cited 32×
• Shank v. Shank
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-23· cited 28×
• Jaskiewicz v. Jaskiewicz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-16· cited 9×