Commonwealth ex rel. Goodman v. Dratch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating: “Unless there [is] some compelling reason, we do not believe that a grandchild should be denied visitation tó his grandparents”
• stating: “Unless there [is] some compelling reason, we do not believe that a grandchild should be denied visitation tó his grandparents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Whitaker
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-05-04· cited 86×
• K.T. v. L.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-17· cited 75×
• Com. Ex Rel. Goodman v. DRATCH Et Ux.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-03-24· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth Ex Rel. McDonald v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-01-17· cited 20×