Skip to main content
· 8/11/2009

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gaurrasi v. Carroll

Citations

  • 979 A.2d 383
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 159
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2281
  • 2009 WL 2437207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating district 'attorney’s disapproval of private criminal complaint, due to lack of evidence to prove elements of crimes charged, constitutes legal conclusion subject to de novo review
  • stating district attorney's disapproval of private criminal complaint due to lack of evidence to prove elements of crimes charged constitutes legal conclusion subject to de novo review
  • contrasting the lack of evidentiary merit to establish a prima facie case as a legal reason for disapproval, versus a policy reason that prosecution would not serve the public interest
  • contrasting the lack of evidentiary merit to establish a prima facie case as a legal reason for disapproval, versus a policy reason that prosecution would not serve the public interest
  • contrasting the lack of evidentiary merit to establish a prima facie case as a legal reason for disapproval, versus a policy reason that prosecution would not serve the public interest
  • record was not clear as to whether prosecutor declined to prosecute for legal reasons, policy reasons, or hybrid of both; remanded for evidentiary hearing on that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Allen, Colville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.