Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Robbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the necessity of expert testimony “for a proper understanding of that which requires scientific or specialized knowledge and which cannot be determined intelligently from testimony on the basis of ordinary knowledge gained in the ordinary affairs of life”
• as to “allegations of the answer . . . [n]o reply was necessary. CR 7.01. The averments of the answer stood denied. CR 8.04”
• “[A] proper understanding of that which requires scientific or specialized knowledge and which cannot be determined intelligently from testimony on the basis of ordinary knowledge gained in the ordinary affairs of life, expert testimony is needed.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).