Commonwealth Associates v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to limit plaintiff's damages on a cover theory because covering would have added to plaintiff's risk
• refusing to limit plaintiffs damages on a cover theory because covering would have added to plaintiffs risk
• \the relevant breach occurred when defendant failed to honor plaintiff's request for registration and issuance of the shares in March 1996\
• firm's assertion, which benefitted from hindsight, that it would have sold stock during a particularly advantageous period was confirmed by the firm's demonstrable need at the time to quickly raise cash in order to satisfy two impending financial obligations
• firm’s assertion, which benefitted from hindsight, that it would have sold stock during a particularly advantageous period was confirmed by the Arm's demonstrable need at the time to quickly raise cash in order to satisfy two impending financial obligations
• rejecting damage computation in stock case as \unrealistic\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).