Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/18/2014
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.
Citations
- 99 A.3d 416
- 627 Pa. 59
- 2014 WL 4064296
- 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under Article I, Section 8, the defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy that the government would not surreptitiously track his real-time CSLI; thus, police are required to obtain a warrant supported by probable cause to acquire real-time CSLI
- indicating that to “place in quarantine” equates to requiring an individual to be “set apart” from other members of society (emphasis added)
- relying, in part, upon the Model Penal Code in construing Section 2901(a) of the Crimes Code
- relying, in part, upon the Model Penal Code in construing Section 2901(a)
- detention for “at least two hours” was not “incidental to the other crimes” though the victims “were confined with the intention of committing the other crimes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. BeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-26· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-19· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. ForreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-01-16· cited 49×
- Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Philadelphia, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-15· cited 41×
- Com. v. Pacheco, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-24· cited 35×
- Com. v. Salinas, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-12-28· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-16· cited 21×
- Com. v. Berrios, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-20· cited 15×
- Com. v. Martinez Santiago, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-01-20· cited 11×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ortiz, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-11-21· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. DischmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-08-29· cited 1×
- Com. v. Stultz, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-04-28
- Com. v. Smith, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-16
- Com. v. Green, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-16
- Com. v. Pacheco, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-03
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. H.D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-03-25
- Com. v. Carl, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-04
- Velasquez Cardozo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-05-23
- Commonwealth v. Pacheco, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-11-17
- Com. v. Whitcomb, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-08-20
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-01-23· cited 350×
- Commonwealth v. DiamondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-27· cited 219×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-30· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-21· cited 189×
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-17· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. HousmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 118×
- Commonwealth v. HookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-21· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. RushingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-06-28· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. MeaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-12· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-16· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. RushingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.