Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Article I, Section 8, the defendant has a legitimate expectation of privacy that the government would not surreptitiously track his real-time CSLI; thus, police are required to obtain a warrant supported by probable cause to acquire real-time CSLI
• indicating that to “place in quarantine” equates to requiring an individual to be “set apart” from other members of society (emphasis added)
• relying, in part, upon the Model Penal Code in construing Section 2901(a) of the Crimes Code
• relying, in part, upon the Model Penal Code in construing Section 2901(a)
• detention for “at least two hours” was not “incidental to the other crimes” though the victims “were confined with the intention of committing the other crimes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).