Common Sense Salmon Recovery v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that raw data collected in studies that were relied upon by the agency were properly excluded from the administrative record
• holding that “because a court’s review of an agency’s decision is confined to the administrative record . . . courts uniformly have held that discovery typically is not permitted”
• declining to supplement the record with “the raw genetic data used in some-of the studies” the Department of Commerce relied upon when listing a particular species as threatened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).