Common Cause v. Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding injury-in-fact but denying standing to consumer litigants alleging price injury because chain of events alleged to produce price increases was \conjectural at best\
• finding injury-in-fact but denying standing to consumer litigants alleging price injury because chain of events alleged to produce price increases was “conjectural at best”
• consumers of \energy products\ who challenged energy-consumption practices of federal government and alleged \shortages and higher prices of energy products\ stated cognizable injury-in-fact
• consumers of “energy products” who challenged energy-consumption practices of federal government and alleged “shortages and higher prices of energy products” stated cognizable injury-in-fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).