Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. White Pine Trust Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing CFTC jurisdiction under 7 U.S.C. § 2(c)(2)(B) where defendants promised to invest clients’ money but then stole the money, because “[o]ne can offer something without actually possessing or having any intention to convey to the offeree the thing offered”
• “[R]egulations . . . cannot go beyond the jurisdictional limits of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).