Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he defendant must make a strong showing of inconvenience to warrant upsetting the plaintiffs choice of forum.”
• holding that “[w]eighing of the 10 factors for and against transfer involves subtle considerations and is best left to the 11 discretion of the trial judge”
• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 9 denying the defendant’s motion to transfer where the “district court was familiar with the case”
• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 9 denying the defendant’s motion to transfer where the “district court was familiar with the case”
• finding that 3 the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to transfer where 4 the “district court was familiar with the case”
• affirming the district court's refusal to transfer and noting that \[t]he district court was familiar with the case and transfer may have led to delay.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).