Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. International Financial Services (New York), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting the motion to withdraw and allowing proposed answers to be substituted for the default admissions
• granting the motion to withdraw and allowing proposed answers to be substituted for the default admissions
• “IFS Inc. and IFS LLC engaged in a common enterprise, and IFS LLC therefore bears joint and several liability for IFS Inc.’s violations.... ”
• “[T]o view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, resolving ambiguities and drawing all inferences in its favor, is not to suspend disbelief.”
• “[T]o view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, resolving ambiguities and drawing all inferences in its favor, is not to suspend disbelief.”
• “[M]isrepresentations concerning profit and risk ... are ... material as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).