Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Harker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the respondent’s argument that evidence that the agency “‘leaked’ infor- mation about [its] investigation” supported granting discovery where the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions “[did] not provide respondents with a guarantee of confidentiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).