· 9/30/2011
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Precious Metals, LLC
Citations
- 845 F. Supp. 2d 1279
- 2011 WL 7431014
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Notably, charging experienced attorney rates merely for scheduling, filing motions, opening emails, or forwarding documents via email is not reasonable.”
- where the district court considered a rejected settlement agreement when granted attorney's fees under the EAJA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zloch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.