Skip to main content
· 7/31/1986

Federal Case

Citations

  • 795 F.2d 1434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that interference with “an established, on-going attorney-client relationship” like the one present here is a “key factor” in finding a violation of the right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.