Commissioner v. Davies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sep- CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE v. LAPETER 2719 arate order requiring funds to be turned over to a receiver was appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, because it finally deter- mined the appellant’s rights in the disputed receivership assets
• holding that a sep- 4142 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE v. LAPETER arate order requiring funds to be turned over to a receiver was appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, because it finally deter- mined the appellant’s rights in the disputed receivership assets
• stating that a nonparty to the litigation on the merits will have standing to appeal the decision when the party participated in the proceedings and the equities favor hearing the appeal
• noting that factual findings are “reviewed for clear error, but with particularly close scru- 17358 SILVER v. EXECUTIVE CAR LEASING tiny [where] the district court adopt[s] [one party’s] proposed findings”
• stating that a nonparty to the litigation on the merits will have standing to appeal the decision when the party participated in the proceedings and the equities favor hearing the appeal
• finding sufficient participation based upon nonparty’s formal objection to receiver’s proposed distribution plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).