Skip to main content
· 3/22/1941

Commissioner v. Dallas Title & Guaranty Co.

Citations

  • 119 F.2d 211
  • 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 70
  • 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subsections (C)(i) and (C)(ii) of 5 U.S.C. § 7511(a)(1) are alternative means of establishing jurisdiction
  • discussing that the Civil Service Due Process Amendments of 1990, of which § 7701(j) is a part, were intended to \remedy [the] state of affairs\ for certain federal employees
  • “[W]hen a statute expresses its purpose in short, clear terms, the duty of the court is to apply the statute as written.”
  • “If the language is clear, the plain meaning of the statute will be regarded as conclusive.”
  • “If the language is clear, the plain meaning of the statute will be regarded as conclusive.”
  • “[Wjhen a statute expresses its purpose in short, clear terms, the duty of the court is to apply the statute as written.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.