Skip to main content
· 10/6/1941

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chaparral Oil Co.

Citations

  • 122 F.2d 933
  • 27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 947
  • 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3107
  • 27 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting Secretary’s interpretation that window of correction is not available when there is an actual pattern of practice of making impermissible disciplinary deductions
  • accepting Secretary's interpretation that window of correction is not available when there is an actual pattern of practice of making impermissible disciplinary deductions
  • finding actual practice despite argument that number of pay deductions per manager was smaller than in other cases where no actual practice was found
  • finding actual practice despite argument that number of pay deductions per manager was smaller than in other cases where no actual practice was found
  • ‘‘the question ... is whether the Secretary’s • interpretation is justified when considered together with the text of [the regulation], taken in context”
  • “The question here is whether Defendant’s improper suspensions of those employees whom it classified as exempt demonstrate that it lacked the intent to pay such employees on a salaried basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.