Commission v. Cephalon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the difference between 5.7 and 9 months was “not an especially significant difference”
• explaining that the public interest factor had “little application” because the “use of reverse-payment settlements” was “not a local issue at all” but instead “a question that has nationwide significance”
• explaining that the public interest factor had “little application” because the “use of reverse-payment settlements” was “not a local issue at all” but instead “a question that has nationwide significance”
• finding that the local interest factor was not applicable to a case of “nationwide significance, the resolution of which will have the same effect if rendered by this Court or the” transferee court
• “The employee witnesses located at Cephalon’s headquarters are under the control of Cephalon and could most likely be compelled to testify here.”
• transferee “court’s familiarity with these facts - and the law as applied to these facts - supports transfer . . . for judicial efficiency purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Douglas v. Chariots for Hire
  District of Columbia· 2013-01-24· cited 58×
• Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of Law
  District of Columbia· 2012-02-17· cited 41×
• United States v. H & R Block, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-06· cited 39×
• The Federal Housing Finance Agency v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2012-04-23· cited 29×
• Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission
  District of Columbia· 2010-08-17· cited 28×
• Wyandotte Nation v. Salazar
  District of Columbia· 2011-11-22· cited 23×
• Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership Gp
  District of Columbia· 2016-02-05· cited 23×
• Bergmann v. United States Department of Transportation
  District of Columbia· 2010-05-07· cited 16×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2009-04-08· cited 14×
• Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell
  District of Columbia· 2014-11-17· cited 11×
• M & N Plastics, Inc. v. Sebelius
  District of Columbia· 2013-11-05· cited 10×
• KING DRUG CO. OF FLORENCE, INC. v. Cephalon, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-03-29· cited 9×
• Holland v. Acl Transportation Services, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-26· cited 9×
• Milanes v. Holder
  District of Columbia· 2009-10-21· cited 9×
• Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-29· cited 1×
• Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission
  District of Columbia· 2010-08-17
• Bergmann v. U. S. Department of Transportation
  District of Columbia· 2010-05-07
• National Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. Army Corps of Engineers
  District of Columbia· 2018-06-08
• Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment Against All Assets of Arelma, S.A., Formerly Held at Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Including, but Not Limited To, Account Number 16
  District of Columbia· 2019-07-15
• Aiken v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
  District of Columbia· 2021-04-15

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Van Dusen v. Barrack
  Supreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
• Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort Zimmerman
  D.C. Circuit· 1978-07-28· cited 249×
• Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture
  District of Columbia· 1996-10-23· cited 225×
• The Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
  District of Columbia· 2000-05-23· cited 94×
• Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
  District of Columbia· 2000-06-26· cited 91×
• In Re Alan Neal Scott
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-06-07· cited 88×
• Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2002-04-23· cited 79×
• Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1991-09-06· cited 75×
• Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. Hazard
  District of Columbia· 1998-09-30· cited 70×
• Vencor Nursing Centers, L.P. v. Shalala
  District of Columbia· 1999-07-08· cited 47×
• Combs v. Adkins & Adkins Coal Co., Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1984-10-19· cited 37×
• Barham v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES
  District of Columbia· 2007-08-02· cited 33×
• FC INVESTMENT GROUP LC v. Lichtenstein
  District of Columbia· 2006-07-21· cited 31×
• Star Lines, Ltd. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Ship. A.
  S.D. New York· 1978-01-05· cited 29×
• Martin-Trigona v. Meister
  District of Columbia· 1987-03-19· cited 22×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ernst & Young
  District of Columbia· 1991-10-09· cited 18×
• Holland v. A.T. Massey Coal
  District of Columbia· 2004-02-06· cited 14×
• United States v. Brown University
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-08-07· cited 13×
• Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
  S.D. New York· 1966-10-11· cited 10×
• At & T Corp. v. Pab, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-07-25· cited 9×