Commissariat À l'Énergie Atomique v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the IPLA “governs all actions brought by a user or consumer against a manufacturer or seller for physical harm caused by a product, regardless of the legal theory upon which the action is brought”
• explaining that the IPLA “governs all actions brought by a user or consumer against a manufacturer or seller for physical harm caused by a product, regardless of the legal theory upon which the action is brought”
• parties' written rental agreement expressly discharged suppliers' duty to warn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).