Skip to main content
· 2/18/1949

Commercial Wholesalers, Inc. v. Investors Commercial Corp.

Citations

  • 172 F.2d 800
  • 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court may preclude a defendant from invoking the advice-of-counsel defense when he refused to answer questions regarding relevant communications with counsel
  • recognizing that “a prevailing plaintiff is entitled to execute upon a judgment” when defendant fails to obtain a formal stay by posting a supersedeas bond
  • holding that district court properly applied these 19 factors when evaluating fee request by prevailing plaintiff in copyright action
  • affirming district court's denial of plaintiff's motion to preclude a jury trial on statutory damages
  • noting that, once the temporary stay of execution created by Rule 62(a) 12 expires, “a prevailing plaintiff is entitled to execute upon a judgment” unless the appellant 13 “obtain[s] a formal stay of the judgment pending appeal by posting a supersedeas bond”
  • “The district court was also within its discretion in excluding evidence of [defendant’s] reliance on advice of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.