Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Walbrook Insurance Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the exception is invoked “sparingly” and suggesting that it would not apply where there is “no evidence that [the insured] participated in drafting the language at issue”
• “[I]t is the circumstances at the time of the filing of the 8 complaint that matters for purposes of the ‘imminent danger’ exception to § 1915(g).”
• “Under the power of 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), enjoining litigants 8 with abusive and lengthy histories is one such form of restriction that the district court may 9 take.”
• Plaintiff attempted to identify witnesses “after a deadline set 8 by the district court”
• overruled on other grounds by United States v. 8 Bacon, 979 F.3d 766 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting United States v. Duncan, 42 F.3d 97, 101 9 (2d Cir. 1994)); see also Hangarter v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 373 F.3d 998, 1016 10 (9th Cir. 2004
• applying Rule 15(a) to § 2254 habeas petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).