Commercial Credit Loans, Inc. v. Espinoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the bid at a sheriff's sale that was one-sixth of the value of the property was an unconscionable disparity
• holding that the bid at a sheriff’s sale that was one- sixth of the value of the property was an unconscionable disparity
• holding a bid that was one-sixth of the value of the property to be an unconscionable disparity
• relying on Citicorp and noting that the high bid at a judicial sale is a mere irrevocable offer, accepted on confirmation by the court
• general rule is that, to have standing, a party must assert its own legal rights and interests, rather than the rights of third parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).