Commercial Credit Corp. v. Stan Cross Buick, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff did not ratify sale by accepting part payment because alleged agent “neither acted nor purported to act on behalf of a principal” when alleged agent sold plaintiff’s car without permission
• holding that no apparent authority existed where alleged agent did not “profess[] to be acting as an agent in the sale of the car” and buyer did not believe that alleged agent “was other than the owner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).