Skip to main content
· 1/10/1985

Commercial Cotton Co. v. United California Bank

Citations

  • 163 Cal. App. 3d 511
  • 209 Cal. Rptr. 551
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 234
  • 55 A.L.R. 4th 1017
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that punitive damages are recoverable where the bank breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing towards its depositor
  • extending the tort action for breach of the implied covenant to some types of banking relationships
  • extending the tort action for breach of the implied covenant to some types of banking relationships
  • insufficient evidence of severe emotional distress where plaintiff “was aggravated and irritated and upset” for a short time
  • “[T]he Supreme Court found it unnecessary to determine how far, if at all, the doctrine should extend to ordinary commercial contracts____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Work

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.