· 1/10/1985
Commercial Cotton Co. v. United California Bank
Citations
- 163 Cal. App. 3d 511
- 209 Cal. Rptr. 551
- 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 234
- 55 A.L.R. 4th 1017
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1513
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that punitive damages are recoverable where the bank breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing towards its depositor
- extending the tort action for breach of the implied covenant to some types of banking relationships
- extending the tort action for breach of the implied covenant to some types of banking relationships
- insufficient evidence of severe emotional distress where plaintiff “was aggravated and irritated and upset” for a short time
- “[T]he Supreme Court found it unnecessary to determine how far, if at all, the doctrine should extend to ordinary commercial contracts____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Work
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.