Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson
Citations
- 250 U.S. 360
- 39 S. Ct. 512
- 63 L. Ed. 1030
- 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1755
Syllabus
<p>Appellants’ suits to enjoin the Postmaster General from interfering with their cable properties, upon the ground that requisition of these by the President, followed by assumption of possession and control by the defendant, was in excess.or abuse of the power given by the Joint Resolution of July 16, 1918, e. 154, 40 Stat. 904, and not attended by adequate provision for compensation, became moot when, by the President’s authority, the properties were restored to them, together with the revenues, admittedly sufficient compensation, derived therefrom during government operation. P. 362. Apprehension that the alleged'wrongs may be repeated and that the revenues may be claimed by'the United States, does not preserve the justiciable quality of these cases. Id.</p> <p>The dismissal of the bills by the District Court for want of equity, upon a holding that compensation was adequately provided for, and that the other objections were nonjusticiable, was such a rejection of the appellants’ asserted right as necessitates a reversal with directions to dismiss without prejudice and without costs. Id. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suit to enjoin government’s seizure of marine cable lines dismissed as moot when the lines were returned while the appeal was pending
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.