Commercial Bank v. Gove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hile a court must generally accept a plaintiff’s factual allegations as true in evaluating a motion to dismiss, it ‘need not accept as true allegations in a complaint that contradict or are inconsistent with judicially-noticed facts.’”
• noting that “[w]hile a court must generally accept a plaintiff’s factual allegations as true in evaluating a motion to dismiss, it ‘need not accept as true allegations in a complaint that contradict or are inconsistent with judicially-noticed facts.’”
• dismissing failure to warn claim where plaintiff “fail[ed] to provide any non-conclusory allegations to suggest that his treating physicians were not informed of the potential side-effects of Risperdal and Wellbutrin”
• dismissing failure to warn claim where plaintiff “fail[ed] to provide any non-conclusory allegations to suggest that his treating physicians were not informed of the potential side-effects of Risperdal and Wellbutrin”
• dismissing failure to warn claim where plaintiff failed to allege any facts that his psychiatrists or any other treating physicians were not informed of the risks associated with Risperdal and Wellbutrin.
• dismissing failure to warn claim where plaintiff failed to allege any facts that his psychiatrists or any other treating physicians were not informed of the risks associated with Risperdal and Wellbutrin.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).